 |
By NICK TYLWALK Special to SLAM! Sports
A weekly SLAM! Wrestling Editorial Column
|
|---|
Defending Goldberg
Down the Ramp
By NICK TYLWALK --
For SLAM! Wrestling
Since I began writing for Slam! back in 1998, a large
number of e-mails sent my way by readers have been of
the "When is X wrestler coming back?" variety. Sting
and Hulk Hogan (until recently) have been popular
choices but the person generating the most interest
was Bill Goldberg. There's no point in debating the
merits of Goldberg someday joining the WWF - that's
been done ad nauseum in various places. What
intrigues me is that interest in the man who burst on
the scene during WCW's heyday hasn't gone away.
It's become trendy for wrestling writers to bash
Goldberg, especially since he's been out of wrestling.
They sneer at his perceived inability to work a match
and laugh at the way he was booked as an
indestructible monster. Some are angered by his
alleged role in the head injury that ended Bret Hart's
wrestling career; others are upset because he
continues to collect money from AOL instead of
returning to the business. People even want to point
to the allegations of piped-in Goldberg chants and say
he was never that popular.
I'll admit that I've fallen into this trap myself.
Nothing drove that point home better than an e-mail I
got from my brother Nate, an opinionated wrestling fan
who lives in Philadelphia. I don't remember how it
came up in conversation, but I do recall making a
snide comment that I've never seen the words
"Goldberg" and "compelling" in the same sentence. His
reply was right on the money, and instead of me
paraphrasing it, I thought I'd just let Nate explain
it in his own words (albeit cleaned up for spelling
and punctuation:
 |
|
Bill Goldberg.
|
"Come on ... Goldberg versus Hogan in the Georgia Dome
on Nitro? Not even a pay-per-view, selling out the
Georgia Dome? Hogan jobbing? And this was after
months, I bet, of Hogan doing no matches on TV but
PPV. Months of those crappy nWo guys running in and
bashing everybody to end every show and PPV. After
Goldberg had to go through all of those guys,
including I believe, Scott Hall twice. That was
absolutely compelling. Anybody who doesn't think that
should be a recent unforgettable moment is using some
revisionist history, because at the time everyone was
into WCW and Goldberg. That was his peak. Anybody
who claims Goldberg was never that over, never that
popular, or tries to era name drop some old crappy
feud instead of that one are lying to himself."
He's right. Though the original plan was to have WCW
get revenge on the nWo at some point, that never
happened - even Sting's victory over Hogan at
Starrcade didn't really do it, and the Stinger even
ended up joining the nWo Wolfpac. It wasn't until
Goldberg came along that WCW regained some face, and
it was only because he had been built up to be
unstoppable during "The Streak" that he fit the role
as savior. You could very logically argue that
Goldberg extended the life of the nWo angle.
 |
|
Bill Goldberg makes Hogan beg on Monday Night Nitro
|
Sure, he might not have been the world's greatest mat
technician, but wrestling history is littered with
examples to prove there's no corelation between
workrate and popularity. It's easy to forget that he
was fairly inexperienced, and Goldberg's look and
presence - things you can't teach people - more than
made up for his shortcomings in the ring. Think
Goldberg wasn't over? Then I guess WCW just handed
out all of those Goldberg t-shirts for free.
For more evidence of Goldberg's enduring popularity,
here's more from Nate:
"Goldberg was an absolute phenomenon, a huge crossover
hit, absolutely a household name. Every talk show,
whatever. He was so big that his appearances are
still making 1wrestling and he is still showing up as
a celebrity of note at many events. He is still
pointed out when he is courtside at the NBA, he is
still featured on SportsCenter in the celeb golf
tournies. He still has endorsements! Still!".
I couldn't have said it better myself. I still don't
think we'll ever see him back in the ring, but this is
wrestling we're talking about, so who knows? I know I
would probably collect the millions still owed to him
by AOL if I were in his position. Regardless, it's
doing the man a real disservice to ignore his impact
or retroactively deny his popularity. Just a few
short years ago, like him or not, Goldberg was "The
Man".
To think I needed my brother to remind me of that.
Thanks Nate.
Previous Columns
Feb. 22 ... WWF return a test for Hall
Feb. 15 ... Nick who?