England must fight War of the Roses

England's national soccer coach Roy Hodgson looks on during a training session for their Euro 2012...

England's national soccer coach Roy Hodgson looks on during a training session for their Euro 2012 soccer match against France, at Suche Stawy stadium in Krakow June 8, 2012. (Nigel Roddis/REUTERS)

James Lawton, QMI Agency

, Last Updated: 7:53 PM ET

Though it hangs on to the grit-smeared old title of City of a Million Roses, this is a place which like few others on earth has always insisted on the hardest work -- whether you were part of a slave labour force or just someone battling to survive in the mines or the steel plant.

Relatively speaking, the plight of Roy Hodgson's re-cast England squad may not be quite so severe Monday but there is still the most compelling case for them to look around and absorb the vibe.

Whatever they do, they are unlikely to get their hands on too many roses but the main task is, of course, avoiding too many regrets.

They have to fight Laurent Blanc's revived French side of much greater creative capacity, and one filled with a sense of renewal rather than the English one that they have found their football equivalent of ground zero, in the knowledge that in their last major tournament they did not merely perform poorly.

They turned the stomach of much of the sporting nation two years ago in the World Cup.

They did it with football that was not only unfit for purpose but riddled with ill-founded ego and appalling lack of focus.

Their manager, Fabio Capello, who many insisted made his own contribution to the disaster, said he didn't recognise his team. It was something any self-respecting football nation might have said.

The French had a scandal of their own, of course, and in some ways it went deeper with the arrival of anarchy in the dressing room and out on the training field. There was, however, a difference.

They reacted. Their fired their eccentric, even loathed, coach, Raymond Domenech, and installed a national hero who had, as it happened, done some impressive work with Bordeaux.

England, by the lamest comparison, preserved their uneasy relationship with Capello, provoked his resignation shortly before the onset of the tournament he had qualified for with some comfort before Wayne Rooney's brain storm in the last game against Montenegro, then gave Hodgson his poisoned chalice with just slightly more time to spare than it would take to plan a family holiday.

This was from an allegedly front-rank football nation which won its one and only major tournament 46 years ago, since which time France has won one World Cup, two European titles and appeared in another World Cup final.

France was exasperated and enraged by the South African denouement. Twenty-three players were given a gravely symbolic suspension. Two years on, England still wrestles with the John Terry problem that so bedevilled them in the World Cup.

So, yes, England has to fight, not for glory but something that might just smack of a bit of redemption, a little regained pride.

Hodgson, no doubt correctly, has already tacitly accepted the accumulated failures of English organization and vision since that sole and distant triumph in 1966. He has said, in so many words, that England cannot live here with the force and imagination of teams like Spain and Germany, and, who knows, a Netherlands coming back from the dead and a Russia buoyed by their brilliant young prospect Alan Dzagoev and the hope that it can produce something more substantial than its early, beguiling running in Euro 2008.

England, says Hodgson, must live off scraps. It must abandon the idea that it can stand toe-to-toe with opponents of France's quality, which was evident enough in the first days of Blanc's appointment when the French scored a psychologically important victory at Wembley.

France outplayed England for most of the game but the French media were not exactly overwhelmed.

"It was nice to see France playing together at the same time on the same field, but remember this was England who drew their last game 0-0 at home to Montenegro," sniffed one Paris newspaper.

Hodgson, after his solid but scarcely inspiring wins over Norway and Belgium, must engage that kind of disdain here Monday, though he might have allowed himself a small smile over the fact that among those predicting an easy French victory is the discredited Domenech, who once hinted that a player's star sign might be a valuable aid to his selection.

If Hodgson looks to the stars here it will have to be those twinkling in the Ukrainian sky because the kind that used to glitter -- at least in their own minds -- in the old days of the 'golden generation' celebrity club, he has already declared are part of the past.

It is something that plainly had to be said and done and what we have now is a resolve to live in the real world -- one in which England cannot expect seriously to compete creatively with a French team that will come at them with an altogether superior attacking force. Franck Ribery, Karim Benzema and Samir Nasri make a combination of speed, finishing flair and the ability to play a killing final ball quite beyond England's resources.

There is also the potential of Hatem Ben Arfa to continue his late run into contention and the superior touch of his Newcastle teammate, Yohan Cabaye. These are possibilities to make the blood race while England, necessarily, stirs up its sinew.

Also required is the captain's performance of his life from Steven Gerrard.

Even at this late hour, he remains the great enigma of the English game -- a player of extraordinary power and inspiration from time to time, he can also suffer terrible betrayals of judgement.

The tackle which took a Norwegian player out of the recent friendly was, say what Hodgson might, nothing less than ludicrous. Too often he lunges rather than thinks but then, of course, there are moments when he reaches an extraordinary understanding of his power to influence a match.

Monday, they simply have to come controlled but also thick and fast. He is under more pressure than at any point since his erratic and underwhelming leadership of the team in the World Cup.

Gerrard has to threaten France with his ability to make the big play and this will require him to produce the best of his judgement. He will certainly not be wise to dwell for more than a nanosecond on the catastrophe that overtook him in the last seconds of England's last appearance against France in this tournament.

It was in England's opening game of 2004 in Lisbon, one in which a goal from Frank Lampard and the brilliance of Rooney, who won a penalty that David Beckham failed to covert, threatened to put down the still luminously gifted reigning champions.

Then Zinedine Zidane scored a superb free-kick and a penalty when Gerrard played a suicide back pass, which led to David James fouling Thierry Henry.

Unfortunately, there is no Lampard or Rooney against France Monday. They might have helped the cause of a manager espousing the new reality and a captain who says he is hell-bent on redeeming all the frustrations of a long international career. It means that England has to work harder than it has ever done before.

Undoubtedly they have come to the right place at the right time. The City of Roses has never offered much reward to anyone wearing flowers in their hair.

- James Lawton writes for The Independent in the UK


Videos

Photos