Sun, February 14, 2010
Should Canada have given foreign athletes more training time?Sun, February 14, 2010 ROB LONGLEY, QMI Agency Did Canada's quest for an Olympic home-field advantage go too far? That's the question being asked after one of the most perilous sliding courses in the world turned deadly Friday morning. |
RECENT TOPICS: Should women hockey players apologize for smoking and drinking on ice? Express your condolences to the Rochette family Should Canada have given foreign athletes more training time? Have Olympic protesters lost credibility after the riot? Have the Olympics become too corporate? Your reaction to Canadian hockey roster? Who would you pick for Team Canada? Will Canada 'own the podium' in 2010? ALL RECENT TOPICS |
MEDAL COUNT
| G | S | B | ||
| United States | 9 | 15 | 13 | 37 |
| Germany | 10 | 13 | 7 | 30 |
| Canada | 14 | 7 | 5 | 26 |
| Norway | 9 | 8 | 6 | 23 |
| Austria | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 |
VOICES FROM THE GAMES
Bob Mackin
Let the Secrecy Games continue
Let the Secrecy Games continue
Bob Mackin
More Village idiocy
More Village idiocy
Bob Mackin
Furlong’s fuzzy math
Furlong’s fuzzy math
Bob Mackin
Wannabe premiers show their donation dockets
Wannabe premiers show their donation dockets




13°
17°/ 9°
Should Canada have given foreign athletes more training time?








At a Formula One race where a driver crashes have you seen Mr. American blaming the track? Ever?
Two things that disturbed me.
1. It was reported that Nodar hadn't gone down a track in 6 weeks. How is this Canada's fault?
2. He called his father and said he was scared of the track.
These 2 things make me wonder why on earth he was there?
It's very unfortunate for all the other athletes that the have to compete (especially the woman) on the "sipping cup" track thanks to an unprepared athlete and the bad press.
Maggie, 2010-02-15 13:22:25
Jake, 2010-02-15 11:19:22
Rick P., 2010-02-15 00:58:07
As has happened throughout the history of this and any other dangerous sport, assessments will be made and recommendations put in place to optimize on improved safety.
But people are jumping on the politically correct bandwagon, and also embracing the absolutes to bolster their polarized arguments on this.
No it was not Canada's fault.
People are making comments as if the track was built last week.
It has had more than 5000 runs made on it. It has been approved by the international body that governs the sport. Statistically there are other tracks in the world which have had many more accidents.
As for the Canadian advantage, the same has been done for previous host nations. All of a sudden this is the basis for someone's safety.
No rules have been broken here.
Some people are clinging to the half-minded logic that because the athlete was not alotted as much training time, therefore that caused the tragedy ?
a) all Canadian athletes started from zero runs on the same track as well
b) if the athlete that crashed had been alotted as much training time as he desired, but still died on the 2nd run, how would you argue that as a factor towards practice time alottment ?
Maybe we should take all the turns out and just put huge air bags at the end of the run.
As for the mouth piece Aussie - did someone put a gun to his head to participate in this sport ?
Mistakes will continue to be made in any dangerous sport, and we will hopefully learn from them and move on. Do you think you're going to get some guarantee on participant safety ?
Someone righteously referenced the works of President Truman to emphasize particpant safety....here's another Truman quote: "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Paul, 2010-02-15 00:53:54
Huge Olympic Fan, 2010-02-15 00:31:12
What is the point in having a competition that aims for the lowest common denominator?
Some competitors went through approximately 200 test runs with no incident.
That information was revealed by an IOC member involved with the sledding discipline. It was a televised interview with him and other IOC members at a press conference yesterday. Both CTV and NBC carried it at various times.
Vince in Ottawa, 2010-02-15 00:25:55
The criticism is anything but constructive on this issue. It is intended to be divisive and disruptive, with the objective to result in it being destructive. People are making witless allegations without knowing the facts.The biggest whiners are from countries that know that they don’t have a snowball’s chance in HADES at winning a medal. We did not hear the Germans, the Russians, the Austrians, the Italians or the Swiss complain. The others say that “They’re asking questions” What bull flap! The reasons that changes were made to the run by adding the padding, and to change the start location was to appease the weasels.Enough already, go back to your militant protesting of the Seal Hunt and the Global Warming,er, Climate Change.
Vince in Ottawa, 2010-02-15 00:22:12
Canada did nothing outside the rules set by the ICO, and the track was fully accredited by the International Luge Federation. What more can be asked?
It is extremely unfortunate that a young athlete lost his life--however, would you strap yourself to a piece of steel and hurdle your largely unprotected self down a icy slope at great speeds? No, you wouldn't.
It is a dangerous concept from the start, and frankly, I am not terribly surprised that it has finally taken a life.
Mike, 2010-02-15 00:11:57
Robert, 2010-02-15 00:05:33
brian, 2010-02-14 23:40:07